![]() |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
230/230 is the same thing as an old school comp 280H Magnum cam, but your cam looks like it is on a 108 LSA instead of the 280H's 106 LSA. Comp's website says
"Hydraulic-Great for Street Machines. Needs stall, headers & gears. Rough idle." Now my thinking on this is that you're sticking it in a 307. Cams act bigger in smaller engines, right? That means it will be choppier and have less "manners" in a 307. I'm saying that the cam isn't optimally matched to your setup. When most people talk sbc cams, they refer to them by the advertised duration numbers. Yours is a 292. When I thought of a small cam for a 307, I was thinking 252. There are about 10 cam sizes in between those two. You can put together a small inch smallblock with a biggish cam, but you need enough static compression to make power with it. You may be around 8.5:1. The more duration, generally the more CR you need. It is a 292 cam, this is what Isky says about their 292 cam...in a 350 "292 Mega Hyd. Compression Ratio: 10-11:1 Rough Idle RPM range:3000-7000 recomended gear ratio: 4.11/4.56 Carburetor rating: 650-780 Combination Hi-Performance Use/Bracket" A stock cam for a 307 probably has specs something like this: Duration @ .050" = 190°/190° Lift @ .050" = .390"/.400" LSA: 114 Look at this page, it calls out the specs on your erson cam... http://www.pbmperformance.com/store.php?catId=327 All the sbc cams above it are smaller. I'm not telling you not to put it in, I'm saying that it isn't small. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|