![]() |
|
#81
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#82
|
||||
|
||||
|
Looks good, the building methods sure are different down there than they are up here.
__________________
Ric Beckman ![]() 1969 Chevelle SS396 1972 Camaro SS350 |
|
#83
|
|||
|
|||
|
I like all the windows ,looks good .
__________________
John |
|
#84
|
||||
|
||||
|
I agree, I have never seen it built that way before.
__________________
Ray 1970 SS Chevelle Van Nuys Built Last edited by shadowgray396; 03-03-2014 at 09:22 PM. |
|
#85
|
|||
|
|||
|
I did a lot of research before I made my final decesion on this type of building. Most people are unaware of this type of structure. Here is a quick read about them if you are interested.
Article: Post and beam construction is rooted in architectural history as far back as the Roman Empire. In fact, Stonehenge itself is a post and beam structure. So are the interiors of both Egyptian and Greek temples. Most of these historical structures were constructed using stone post and beams. Over time, wooden beams began replacing the stone because wood required fewer supports which allowed for larger interior spaces without interruption. Post and beam construction is the simplest example of load and support construction – two upright columns or posts supporting a horizontal rafter or beam. This type of construction is the basis of all structural openings from doors to windows, from ceilings to roofs. While surviving as one of the simplest forms of lad and support construction, the post and beam system has undergone recognizable changes over time without veering far from the original concept. The most obvious change is in material. From stone to wood, wood to metal, metal to reinforced concrete and back again, the materials for building have gotten stronger, and for the most part, lighter over time. Post material must be strong in compression and be able to support its load without buckling. Both wood and metal have proven excellent for this job. The beam, in turn, must bear the weight of the load that rests upon it whether it is a floor ceiling or roof. Steel and wood have far outperformed stone in this position due to their strength in bending. This bow-strength allows for much greater spans which in turn allow for larger openings. Modern construction has taken great advantage of this property of wood enabling construction of buildings of varying shape, size, and length. Much modern construction in both steel and concrete is based on the post and beam system as well. This includes most modern skyscrapers across the world. The original concept has, however, changed over time. While post and beam used to be two separate pieces, they have now become one single unit allowing for the stressed to be evenly distributed throughout. This uni-body construction of the original post-and beam unit has led the way towards pre-engineered and prefabricated home panels and units allowing for home construction to occur much more quickly and efficiently. Last edited by FlintTony; 03-03-2014 at 04:54 AM. Reason: Too much reading |
|
#86
|
|||
|
|||
|
I like that everything is one level with no steps anywhere ,wish my house was like that .
__________________
John |
|
#87
|
||||
|
||||
|
I like that there are no load bearing internal walls and this way may save money.
__________________
Ric Beckman ![]() 1969 Chevelle SS396 1972 Camaro SS350 |
|
#88
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Yep, no load bearing walls. I'm thinking that we'll have open ceilings in the front half of the house. Exposed, boxed trusses, with planking at the roof. It cost me about 25% more to build this way than conventional stick-framed. My brother Doug is a licensed Master carpenter and he carries a Contractors liscense in Michigan and Florida. We had a couple of arguments. He wanted to build it ourselves, stick style. Said we could save a ton of money, but I wanted this style. |
|
#89
|
||||
|
||||
|
Tony weren't you looking for something like this http://phoenix.craigslist.org/nph/cto/4328070592.html
__________________
Ric Beckman ![]() 1969 Chevelle SS396 1972 Camaro SS350 |
|
#90
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
|
|